The Descendants of 
Jacob's Nation

Question: What Does It Mean To Be A National?
Answer: The term “national” means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state.

Check This Out----->THE SOVEREIGN CITIZEN by: Judge Dale 



Our federal government has instructed our federal, state and local police agencies that everyone who purports to be a SOVEREIGN should be TREATED as a TERRORIST! They have also brainwashed the American public into believing that being a SOVEREIGN is anti-American and unpatriotic! Perhaps this is: “The POT calling the KETTLE black?”

 WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY? It is the inherent right and prerogative of a civilized people to rule itself, and to dictate all of the forms and conditions of the institutions it sets up to carry out this rule. Ironically, the U.S. SUPREME COURT agrees with those people who claim to be SOVEREIGN citizens of the American Republic!


Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 – 2000, The Supreme Court held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not the States or the Government. The court went on to define that local, state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions against the Sovereign People by the enforcement of the laws and are personally liable for their actions. 


What are the implications of this 2000, U. S. Supreme Court ruling? 

1] The delegates to the first Federal Convention prohibited the use of corporations by all governments representing the American Republic. Therefore, all of these corporate governments and their corporate laws are a usurpation of the organic Constitution of the United States of America. All State Governments are now sub-corporations of the Federal Government, making all Courts and all law enforcement personnel, corporate federal agencies or employees.


2] The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, State Legislatures, City Councils, Municipalities and all State and Federal Courts are corporate entities posing as Constitutional branches of government. 


3] Corporations are privately owned businesses, meaning that the Corporate United States belongs to one or more private individuals, which is always governed by a Board of Directors. The Corporate United States is privately owned by a group of European Royal and Elite individuals tied to the Federal Reserve System and the letters of incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. The President of the United States is actually the CEO of the United States and the Congress and all others are corporate employees. Everything they do is in the interest of the corporate owners! I can’t access those documents because of National Security. 


4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal Laws to govern the SOVEREIGN public, government must be SOVEREIGN too, which is an accepted RULE of LAW derived from the Ancient Law of Kings. Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are fiction and only exist on paper.


5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do! 


6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations? 


[Citations and Complaints are contracts but they lack transparency because you were never told what might happen to you if you agree to contract, and that you had a right to refuse the accommodation!]


7] Do any of Americas Courts have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN? Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they compel [Summon or Subpoena] you to appear or participate in their process? No … they can’t compel you and Yes … they can ask but you can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about it because you have refused to give the court jurisdiction over you!


8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bank v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]


9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Laws or Transparency in the American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison under these CIVIL LAWS are in prison by CONSENT and therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!


10] Most of the County and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick back to the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch provides general oversight for these institutions. So if you are convicted in these Courts, you can expect to serve some jail time! Now you know why America has such high prison populations!


11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of your children? Only with your consent, otherwise their agents and officers can be held personally liable for their actions! Orphans are a different matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated.


Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American Constitution and this corporatism onslaught in America has since its creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN and TERRORIST REGIME and are in fact the real TERRORIST and TRAITORS to the American Republic. 






Here's the legal definition of THE STRAWMAN: Straw man is a third party that holds property in intermission for the sole purpose of transferring it to another. In property law, a straw man would be the person whom a grantor transfers land to for some reason; (sometimes known as a "front") for the sole purpose of concealing the true owner.  Understand More!

Learn What It Means To Be FREE!

My Letter To You My Friend

Embracing Freedom and Overcoming Tyranny

Dear Friends,

I hope this letter finds you in good health and high spirits. In a world where tyranny casts its shadow over the lives of many, I write to you today with a message of hope, resilience, and the pursuit of freedom. Allow me to share some thoughts on how we can collectively liberate ourselves from the clutches of tyranny and create a society built on justice, compassion, and individual rights.

To begin this trans formative journey, we must first recognize that true freedom is not merely the absence of external restraints but a state of mind. It starts with cultivating a strong sense of self-awareness and acknowledging our inherent worth and dignity as human beings. Each and every one of us possesses unique talents, ideas, and aspirations that deserve to be recognized and respected. By embracing our own value, we lay the foundation for breaking free from the chains of tyranny.

Education plays a pivotal role in this quest for freedom. Knowledge is power, and an informed populace is the greatest threat to tyranny. Seek out diverse sources of information, engage in critical thinking, and question the status quo. It is through continuous learning that we can expose propaganda, challenge false narratives, and empower ourselves and others with the truth.

However, freedom cannot be achieved alone. We must build a network of like-minded individuals who share our vision of a just and free society. Forming communities where ideas can be freely expressed, discussed, and debated strengthens our collective resolve. By uniting in our pursuit of liberty, we create a force that is difficult to oppress or silence.

In the face of tyranny, it is crucial to remember that change is often a gradual process. Patience and perseverance are virtues that will carry us through the darkest of times. Remember the stories of those who fought against oppression throughout history. Draw inspiration from their unwavering determination, their refusal to succumb to fear, and their relentless pursuit of justice. Let their courage fuel your own.

It is equally important to express our dissent in a peaceful and constructive manner. Nonviolent resistance has proven time and again to be a powerful tool against tyranny. Engage in peaceful protests, advocacy, and civil disobedience when necessary. Through these actions, we challenge the oppressive systems that seek to limit our freedoms and inspire others to join the cause.

Finally, let love and compassion guide our actions. Tyranny thrives on division, hatred, and fear. By embracing empathy, understanding, and inclusivity, we dismantle the walls that tyranny seeks to build. Treat others with kindness, respect, and dignity, even in the face of adversity. Remember that our struggle for freedom is not just for ourselves but for the liberation of all humanity.

In conclusion, dear friend, the path to freedom is arduous, but it is not insurmountable. By fostering self-awareness, seeking knowledge, building communities, practicing patience, engaging in peaceful resistance, and embracing love and compassion, we can free ourselves from the grip of tyranny. Let us march forward together, with unwavering hope and indomitable spirit, towards a future where freedom reigns supreme.

Yours in the pursuit of freedom,

 Queen Shebna Of ...The Descendants Of Jacob's Micro-Nation

Ownership Learn It

Fictional Persona/Entity 


Understanding The Secret, Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 

Existence of Life: Cestui Que Vie   

London 1666, during the black plague and great fires of London, Parliament enacted an act behind  closed doors, called Cestui Que Vie Act 1666.  

The act being debated was to subrogate the rights of men and women, meaning all men and women  were declared dead, lost at sea/beyond the sea. (back then operating in Admiralty law, the law of the  sea, so lost at sea).  

The state (London) took custody of everybody and their property into a trust. The state became the  trustee/husband holding all titles to the people and property, until a living man comes back to reclaim  those titles, he can also claim damages.  

When CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a name this always refers to a legal entity/fiction, Company  or Corporation no exceptions. e.g. John DOE or Jane DOE:  


1) CEST TUI QUE TRUST: (pronounced setakay) common term in New Zealand and Australia  2) STRAWMAN: common term in United States of America or Canada  


These are the legal entity/fiction created and owned by the Government who created it. It is like  owning a share in the Stock Market, you may own a share… but it is still a share of the Stock.  

Legally, we are considered to be a fiction, a concept or idea expressed as a name, a symbol. That legal  person has no consciousness; it is a juristic person, ENS LEGIS, a name/word written on a piece of paper.  This traces back to 1666, London is an Independent City/State, just like the Vatican is an Independent  City/State, just like Washington D.C is an Independent City/State.  

The Crown is an unincorporated association. Why unincorporated? It’s private. The temple bar is in  London, every lawyer called to the “bar” swears allegiance to the temple bar. You can’t get called  without swearing this allegiance.  


Our only way out is to reclaim your dead entity (strawman) that the Crown created, become the  executor and then collapse the so called Cestui Que Vie trust and forgive yourself of your debts and  then remove yourself from the admiralty law that holds you in custody.  

When London burned, the subrogation of men’s and women’s rights occurred. The responsible act  passed… CQV act 1666 meant all men and women of the UK were declared dead and lost beyond the seas.  The state took everybody and everybody’s property into trust. The state takes control until a living man  or woman comes back and claims their titles by proving they are alive and claims for damages can be  made.  


This is why you always need representation when involved in legal matters, because you’re dead.  


The legal fiction is a construct on paper, an estate in trust. When you get a bill or summons from court it  is always in capital letters, similar to tombstones in graveyards. Capital letters signify death. They are  writing to the dead legal fiction. A legal fiction was created when someone informed the government  that there was a new vessel in town, based upon your birth.  

Birth Certificates are issued to us by the Doc. just as ships are given berth  

Certificates at the Dock. It’s about commerce. We come from our mothers’ waters. Your mother has a  birth canal just like a ship. The ship moves by the sea current just as we are able to move by the  currency.  

All this information relates to how the general public are still legally tied through Maritime Admiralty  Law. Through this ancient legal construct, we can be easily controlled and duped. Learning about your  legal fiction helps you to unlock yourself. Otherwise you are just an empty vessel floating on the sea of  commerce. Parents are tricked into registering the birth of their babies.  

In about 1837 the Births, Deaths and Marriages Act was formed in the UK and the post of registrar general  was established. His job was to collect all the data from the churches which held the records of birth.  

Regis – from Queen or Crown. All people are seen to be in custody of,” The Crown”. This allows people  to function in commerce and to accept the benefits provided by the state. We have to understand who we  are as men and women and how we can relate in the system. The City of London is a center for markets,  where merchants work. Then there is Mercantile Law. It comes from Admiralty Law. Look at the  symbols in your City Courts that relate to Admiralty.  

So, where you have commerce and money, you also have “justice” and “injury”.  

You need to understand bankruptcy before you can understand the judiciary. We have accepted the  claim to accept the summons, yet ONLY the dead can be summoned. There is an obligation to accept  any liability which has been created. 


We are operating in Admiralty. A not guilty plea, or ANY plea admits jurisdiction. The strawman, aka  legal fiction is always guilty. Barristers and solicitors make a living out of creating controversy. By  creating a controversy, you become liable for the case.  

Honor and dishonor. To remain in honor, you have to accept a claim and settle (discharge) it. Then you  add conditions, i.e. “I accept on proof of claim and proof of loss”. This gives the liability back to them.  The legal fiction is always guilty. Only in the High Court, can the real man or woman appear. Games are  played on courts, hence the name ‘court’. It is a game with actors (acting on acts). It has to be treated as  a game and just business. Courtroom dramas are misinformation.  

In the public, we are operating in bankruptcy and you receive benefits. It takes a lot of time, effort and  study to understand and use these tools. You have to be prepared to go fully through the process, get  the right tool out of your toolbox at the right time.  

People need to learn how to act as a creation of God rather than a creation of Man.    


Rights Suspension and Corruption 

Cestui Que Vie Trust 

Canon 2036  

A Cestui Que Vie Trust, also known later as a “Fide Commissary Trust” and later again as a “Foreign Situs  trust” and also known as a form of “Secret Trust ”is a fictional concept being a Temporary Testamentary  Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and  updated by Charles II through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1666 wherein an Estate may be effected for the  Benefit of one or more Persons presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed/presumed  “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions by which such a Trust may be formed were added  in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages and private companies.  

Canon 2037  

The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the  benefit of another because some  

event, state of affairs or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and  present before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes or arguments that  deviate in terms of the origin and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust as pronounced by these canons is  false and automatically null and void. A Cestui Que (Vie) Trust may only exist for seventy (70) years  being the traditional accepted “life” expectancy of the estate.  


Canon 2039  

As all Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created on one or more presumptions based on its original purpose  and function, such a Trust cannot be created if none of these presumptions can be proven to exist.  


Canon 2042  

In 1534, prior to the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act (1540), Henry VIII declared the first Cestui Que Vie type  estate with the Act of Supremacy which created the Crown Estate. In 1604, seventy (70) years later,  James I of England modified the estate as the Crown Union (Union of Crowns). By the 18th Century, the  Crown was viewed as a company. However by the start of the 19th Century around 1814 onwards upon  the bankruptcy of the company (1814/15) , it became the fully private Crown Corporation controlled by  European private banker families.  


Canon 2043  

Since 1581, there has been a second series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of  “persons” and rights which migrated to the United States for administration including:  


(i) In 1651 the Act for the Settlement of Ireland 1651-52 which introduced the concept of  “settlements”, enemies of the state and restrictions of movement in states of “emergency”;  and  

(ii) In 1861 the Emergency Powers Act 1861; and  

(iii) In 1931 the Emergency Relief and Construction Act 1931-32; and (iv) in 2001 the Patriot Act  2001.    


Canon 2044  

Since 1591, there has been a third series of Cestui Que Vie Estates concerning the property of “soul”  and ecclesiastical rights which migrated to the United States for administration including:  

(i) In 1661 the Act of Settlement 1661-62; and (ii) In 1871 the  

District of Columbia Act 1871; and (iii) In 1941 the Lend Lease Act  


Canon 2045  

By 1815 and the bankruptcy of the Crown and Bank of England by the Rothschilds, for the 1st time, the  Cestui Que Vie  

Trusts of the United Kingdom became assets placed in private banks effectively becoming “private  trusts” or “Fide Commissary Trusts” administered by commissioners (guardians). From 1835 and the  Wills Act, these private trusts have been also considered “Secret Trusts” whose existence does not need  to be divulged.  


Canon 2046  

From 1917/18 with the enactment of the Sedition Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act in the United  States and through the United Kingdom, the citizens of the Commonwealth and the United States  became effectively “enemies of the state” and “aliens” which in turn converted the “Fide Commissary”  private secret trusts to “Foreign Situs” (Private International) Trusts.  

Canon 2047  

In 1931, the Roman Cult, also known as the Vatican created the Bank for International Settlements for  the control of claimed property of associated private central banks around the world. Upon the  deliberate bankruptcy of most countries, private central banks were installed as administrators and the  global  

Cestui Que Vie/Foreign Situs Trust system was implemented from 1933 onwards.  


Canon 2048  

Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State(Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie)  Trusts are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to deny the child forever any rights  of Real Property, any Rights as a Free Person and any Rights to be known as man and woman rather  than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.  

Canon 2049 

Since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly  and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary into the 1st Cestui Que(Vie)  Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate  Person and denying the child any rights as an owner of Real Property. 


Canon 2050  

Since 1933, when a child is born, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate knowingly and  willingly claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the  ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the feet of the baby onto the live birth record, or  a drop of its blood as well as tricking the parents to sign the baby away through the deceitful legal  meanings on the live birth record. This live birth record as a promissory note is converted into a slave  bond sold to the private reserve bank of the estate and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate Cestui  Que (Vie) Trust per child owned by the bank. Upon the promissory note reaching maturity and the bank being unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and itself monetized as currency issued in series against the Cestui Que (Vie) Trust.  

Canon 2051  

Each Cestui Que Vie Trust created since 1933 represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the 3 claims  of property of the Roman Cult, being Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property and  the denial of any rights to men and women, other than those chosen as loyal members of the society  and as Executors and Administrators.  

Canon 2052  

The Three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts are the specific denial of rights of Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical  

Property for most men and women, corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla  of the Bar  

Association Courts. The first form of law is corporate commercial law is effective because of the 1st  Cestui Que Vie Trust. The second form of law is maritime and trust law is effective because of the 2nd  Cestui Que Vie Trust. The 3rd form of law is Talmudic and Roman Cult law is effective because of the 3rd  Cestui Que Vie Trust of Baptism.  


Canon 2053  

The Birth Certificate issued under Roman Law represents the modern equivalent to the Settlement Certificates of the 17th century and signifies the holder as a pauper and effectively a Roman Slave. The  Birth Certificate has no direct relationship to the private secret trusts controlled by the private banking  network, nor can it be used to force the administration of a state or nation to divulge the existence of  these secret trusts.  

Canon 2054  

As the Cestui Que Vie Trusts are created as private secret trusts on multiple presumptions including the  ongoing bankruptcy of certain national estates, they remain the claimed private property of the Roman  Cult banks and therefore cannot be directly claimed or used. 


Canon 2055  

While the private secret trusts of the private central banks cannot be directly addressed, they are still  formed on certain presumptions of law including claimed ownership of the name, the body, the mind and soul of infants, men and  

women. Each and every man and woman has the absolute right to rebuke and reject such false  presumptions as a holder of their own title.  


Canon 2056  

Given the private secret trusts of the private central banks are created on  

false presumptions, when a man or woman makes clear their Live  

Borne Record and claim over their own name, body, mind and soul, any such trust based on such  false presumptions ceases to have any property.  


Canon 2057  

Any Administrator or Executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, upon a  Person establishing their status and competency, is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their  fiduciary duties requiring their immediate removal and punishment.  


One can take control of the Trust Estate or “Dissolve” it completely and move all Assets to  your own account and take control of your Copyright Name and NAME Trademark and  Trade Name and write Promissory note as this is Tender Cash.  

You have three choices:  

1. Do nothing and stay a UK/U.S. CANADA/Commonwealth citizen/ slave;  

2. Cancel the bond and be free; or  

3. Claim the bond, control it, collect your 'stolen futures' and make Cash by your Signature and  be free. 


Steps To Take To Become Free

My friends, I'd like to tell you about the measures I took to become a citizen of the United States of America Republic. I honestly had no idea what to anticipate when I initially learned about the STRAWMAN reality or how to proceed after discovering so much so quickly. All I did know is that I was really anxious to get started and then implement what I learned right away. I'll add that choosing to do this is a major life decision. I think you have to be devoted to desiring greater things in life and acknowledging your freedom. You need to reclaim what has always been yours by mentally reprogramming yourself. You must question everything you think you know. Additionally, I accept PayPal donations at @shebna101. Since this knowledge should be free, I think it's important to share my own experience with everyone. I don't want to be like so many others that feel the need to charge so much money for this valuable information. I also believe by me showing you how to take the steps to redeeming your freedom, donations are allowing people to give from their hearts rather than swindling folks. While putting what will be revealed on this website into motion, I'm willing to walk with anyone and everyone on this journey and I will hold your hand every step of the way. In the near future I will also upload videos explaining how to become a citizen of the United States of America Republic to the website and via YouTube. Please feel free to write to me at sushonshebna@thedescendantsofjacobsnation.com if you have any questions.


The answer to your constitutionally protected rights is to obtain a passport if you haven't yet, and to update the one you currently have. It all comes down to citizenship. It's that easy. 

A U.S. citizen is thus neither a citizen of a union State or of the USA republic, but of this federal corporation. Therefore, it is clear that a citizen of the United States is a legal fiction or a U.S. company without constitutional protections. The constitution protects only human rights, not those of legal fictions. 

You should have selected "other" on the application because you are a "Citizen of the State" in which you were born, as defined in articles 3 and the 11th amendment of the constitution, which is the same as a "Citizen of the United States" as defined in articles 1 and 2 of the constitution, making you a Citizen of all states, one of the people, and a beneficiary of the republic U.S.A. constitution of 1789/1791. A State Citizen is a United States Citizen. It differs from a "Citizen of the United States" as defined by the 14th amendment.

Additionally, the 14th Amendment was only approved by two states. Therefore, it cannot exist legally. A person who is born in the United States, a federal territory governed by congress, is a citizen under the 14th amendment. This is different from being born in one of the several states that make up the Union. The government of the Dejure Republic is the United States of America, not the corporation-level United States.

The United States of America, not the United States, is established by the constitution's preamble. As a result, we have two distinct and separate national governments. The opponent has long wanted to commit this betrayal.

"The notion that we have in this country essentially two national governments—one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its limitations, and the other to be maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed to—is prevalent with some, and it even finds expression in arguments at the bar. Please allow me to declare that our legal system will undergo a dramatic and malicious shift if the ideas here outlined are ever approved by a majority of this court.

If that happens, we'll move from a time where constitutional liberty was safeguarded and preserved by a written constitution to one where legislative absolute power reigned. If the notion of a government that is not subject to the Supreme Law of the Land gains acceptance in our constitutional jurisprudence, it will be a bad day for American liberty. This court has no higher obligation than to use all of its power to stop any Constitutional values from being violated.

Therefore, in order to regain your citizenship, you must get a passport designating you as a "State Citizen" and prove your status. Your birth certificate, which is necessary for your passport, serves as both your title and the deed to the rights guaranteed by our founding documents. It also serves as confirmation that you are a State Citizen. You are the bond holder and beneficiary, and it is written on bond paper. However, because the government is deceitfully concealing it from the public, you won't see the word "State Citizen" on any paperwork.  They utilize phrases like "Citizen of the United States", "non-citizen national", "national", or "other". When you receive your passport, it will appear generically and state that you are an American citizen.  If you are a 14th amendment citizen, a state citizen, or a citizen of the United States, this is true.  They do this in order to conceal their actions. Keep in mind that a US citizen is only a legal fiction (a US corporation) with no actual rights. A citizen under the 14th Amendment has little rights. Our fundamental texts guarantee each and every State Citizen complete freedom and liberty. You are not a legal fiction, a US business, a citizen of the US, or a citizen under the 14th amendment.

According to articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution, you are a citizen of the state in which you were born, a national who is not a citizen of the United States, and a citizen of the United States.


By updating our passport status, we reclaim our rights and our life. We have made the decision to exist "de jure" in the living world. Come along with me, my friends, and I'll help you reclaim what has always been yours. If you're ready to make changes in your life, please get in touch with me. sushonshebna@thedescendantsofjacobsnation.com is my email address.


When a child is delivered medically alive in the US, the Certificate of Live Birth is completed and comprises the following details: the birth date, name of the infant, name of the parents, names of the attending physicians, the birthplace's medical facility, the person's name who filled out the birth record, the infant's color, weight, gender, and other medical issues. One of the first legal documents you obtain is your birth certificate.
Without even getting to know you, we may infer that your birth certificate was probably obtained without your permission, with the help of your parents or other caretakers, at the time you were born. Have you ever overheard someone discussing the requirement for birth certificate authentication? Therefore, why should your birth certificate be authenticated?
A birth certificate must be authenticated in order to prove its legitimacy.
By authenticating a birth certificate, you claim possession of it and turn it into a document of title that you may use to command your strawman. It is the main justification for updating our birth records. 


Authentication of your birth certificate on the county level involves verifying that the document was issued by the county in which you were born, and that the information on the document is accurate. Authentication on the state level involves verifying that the document was issued by the state in which you were born, and that it meets the state's standards for authenticity. And finally, authentication on the federal level involves verifying that the document has been issued by the federal government or a foreign government and meets the U.S. government's standards for authenticity. By authenticating your birth certificate on all levels, you can ensure that you have a valid and accepted form of identification that can be used for a variety of important purposes.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need assistance authenticating your birth certificate. sushonshebna@thedescendantsofjacobsnation.com is my email address. 


A UCC 1 financing statement, also known as a Uniform Commercial Code 1 financing statement, is a legal document used to establish a creditor's security interest in specific collateral owned by a debtor. It is an essential part of the UCC, a standardized set of laws governing commercial transactions in the United States.

The UCC 1 financing statement serves as a public notice to other potential creditors about a secured party's claim on the debtor's assets. By filing this document with the appropriate state agency, typically the Secretary of State's office, the secured party puts other creditors on notice of their interest in the collateral. It creates a public record of the secured party's claim and helps establish priority among multiple creditors in the event of the debtor's default or bankruptcy.

Here are some key aspects of a UCC 1 financing statement:

Parties Involved:

  • Secured Party: The individual or entity providing the loan or extending credit. They hold a security interest in the collateral.
  • Debtor: The individual or entity receiving the loan or credit. They possess the collateral that is used to secure the debt.


  • The collateral represents the property or assets that the debtor offers as security for the loan or credit. It can include physical assets such as equipment, inventory, or vehicles, as well as intangible assets like accounts receivable or intellectual property.

Contents of the UCC 1 Financing Statement:

  • Debtor Information: The name and address of the debtor must be accurately provided. In some cases, additional information such as the debtor's social security number or organizational identification number may be required.
  • Secured Party Information: The name and address of the secured party should be included.
  • Collateral Description: The UCC 1 financing statement must provide a detailed description of the collateral. It is crucial to be specific and accurate in identifying the assets to avoid ambiguity or confusion.
  • Financing Statement Duration: The filing usually has a stated duration, typically five years, after which it expires. To maintain the security interest beyond the expiration, the secured party must file a continuation statement before it lapses.

Purpose and Importance:

  • Establishing Priority: Filing a UCC 1 financing statement allows the secured party to establish their priority over other creditors in the event of the debtor's default or bankruptcy. The first creditor to file generally holds the highest priority.
  • Public Notice: By filing this statement, the secured party notifies other potential creditors and interested parties that they have a security interest in the specified collateral. It helps prevent subsequent creditors from claiming ignorance of existing security interests.
  • Enforcing Security Interest: In the event of default, the secured party has a legal basis to repossess and sell the collateral to recover the outstanding debt. The UCC 1 filing helps protect the secured party's rights during this process.

It's important to note that the UCC 1 financing statement is a public document accessible to anyone who searches the relevant state filing office's records. Therefore, it serves as a vital tool for lenders, creditors, and interested parties to assess the encumbrances on a debtor's assets before entering into any transactions or extending credit.

However, please keep in mind that while this information provides a general understanding of a UCC 1 financing statement, specific rules and requirements can vary from state to state. It is always advisable to consult with legal professionals or appropriate authorities for precise guidance on UCC filings in your jurisdiction.

My email address is sushonshebna@thedescendantsofjacobsnation.com, and in exchange for a donation, I'll be happy to walk you through the full procedures to becoming a secured party creditor the correct way.






Rule 220. Birth Certificates 

The Registrar of Titles is authorized to receive for registration of memorials upon any outstanding certificate of title an official birth certificate pertaining to a registered owner named in said certificate of title showing the date of birth of said registered owner, providing there is attached to said birth certificate an affidavit of an affiant who states that he/she is familiar with the facts recited, stating that the party named in said birth certificate is the same party as one of the owners named in said certificate of title; and that thereafter the Registrar of Titles shall treat said registered owner as having attained the age of the majority at a date 18 years after the date of birth shown by said certificate.


I am convinced the purpose of this rule is to notify the HOLDERS of our birth certificate, the (Vital Records Office) that we are of legal age. That we are at an age where we can manage our own financial affairs. The STATE where you were born has always been the trust's HOLDERS/CONTROLLERS since the day of your birth. In my case it was the State of NEW YORK. The birth certificate is an instrument/ TRUST that was created by the U.S. Government (the corporation). As you can see, the STATE along with the government has been in charge of our trust while also profiting from it. I now understand that our genuine signature  equals MONEY. Informing the STATE that we are of legal age enables us to regain control of our TRUST.

Affidavits must be written, notarized, and sent to the Vital Records Office in the state to which you were born. Get in touch with me, I'll share with  you what actions to take. sushonshebna@thedescendantsofjacobsnation.com is my email address. I am eager to chat with you.







I Want T Share An Article Friends:


UNC School of Government 

Revised November 2013 

Note: Much of the information for this paper was provided by detectives Rob Finch and Kory Flowers of  the Greensboro, NC, Police Department, Amy Funderburk of the NC Administrative Office of the Courts,  and David Adinolfi of the NC Attorney General’s Office. 


What is a sovereign citizen? 

“Sovereign citizen” is a catchall phrase referring to a variety of anti-government individuals and  groups who share some common beliefs and behaviors. The organizations to which many sovereign  citizens belong have a variety of names: Moorish Nation, The Aware Group, Washitaw Nation, the North  Carolina American Republic, Republic of the United States of America, etc. The same views may be  embraced by Freeman, Freemen on the Land, Sons of Liberty, and Aryan Nation. Many sovereign citizens  may not affiliate with any of those groups. In one way or another, though, all sovereign citizens,  whether tied to an organization or not, adhere to a view that the existing American governmental  structure, including the courts and law enforcement, is illegitimate and that they, the sovereign citizens,  retain an individual common law identity exempting them from the authority of those fraudulent  government institutions.  

Sovereign citizens may issue their own driver’s licenses and vehicle tags, create and file their  own liens against government officials who cross them, question judges about the validity of their oaths,  challenge the applicability of traffic laws to them and, in extreme cases, resort to violence to protect  their imagined rights. They speak an odd quasi-legal language and believe that by not capitalizing names  and by writing in red and using certain catch phrases they can avoid any liability in our judicial system.  They even think they can lay claim to vast sums of money held by the United States Treasury, based on  the premise that the government has secretly pledged them as security for the country’s debts. Based  on these beliefs, and a twisted understanding of the Uniform Commercial Code, they try various  schemes that they think discharge them from responsibility for their debts. 

At their most harmless, sovereign citizens are cranks who talk what seems like gibberish to cops  and magistrates and judges and then become law abiding when they face real legal trouble. At a  different level, they may severely burden the courts and other government offices with the filing of  hundreds and hundreds of pages of nonsensical documents. And at their very worst, they may resort to  deadly force to defend their strange beliefs. 


What they believe 

Although the myriad sovereign citizen groups, and individuals not tied to a particular group, all  have their own idiosyncrasies in their beliefs, they tend to share some common ideas. The first is that 


there are two classes of citizens within the United States. One class is sovereign or “de jure” citizens or  “original citizens of the states.” The second class, first created by the Fourteenth Amendment, is federal  or U.S. citizens. Sovereign citizens enjoy all the rights of the constitution, but federal citizens do not.  Federal citizens, the sovereigns believe, have bargained away their freedoms by accepting benefits from  the United States government. Much of what sovereigns do is intended to rescind or denounce that  federal citizenship and reclaim their common law sovereign citizen status with all its rights. That helps  explain why they refuse to get drivers’ licenses or register vehicles, reject Social Security, avoid using ZIP  codes, and may not pay taxes, because those are all forms of contracting with the government and  accepting the lesser class of federal citizenship. 

Reconstruction history is important to many sovereign citizens. Their view is that the  governments established in southern states after the Civil War were imposed against the will of and  without the consent of the citizens and are not lawful. These sovereigns distinguish between the original  state, of which they are citizens, and the false and illegitimate state that occupies the same territory.  And, as already mentioned, they view the Fourteenth Amendment as the source of the new separate  class of federal citizenship. 

A second significant tenet for sovereign citizens, blending with the distinction between sovereign and federal citizens, is that when the federal government abandoned the gold standard in the  1930s it substituted its citizens as collateral for the country’s debts by pledging each citizen’s future  earnings to foreign investors. As with all other aspects of sovereign ideology, the details can vary  considerably, but generally the explanation for how this happens is that a secret United States Treasury  account is set up for each citizen at birth, some large sum of money placed in it or pledged to it, ranging  from hundreds of thousands of dollars — $630,000 is a common number — to millions depending on  which sovereign citizen group’s version you hear. As a consequence, they say, two separate identities  are created. The corporate shell account, the one pledged as security, is the “strawman” to which  sovereign citizens refer and, in their view, is separate and distinct from their true flesh and blood identity.  

In sovereign citizens’ view, the government-controlled and enslaved strawman is evidenced by  documents showing the person’s name in all capital letters. Birth certificates, social security cards,  driver’s licenses, tax forms, etc., therefore, represent only the shell corporate identity, the strawman,  because they are written in all caps.  

A sovereign citizen avoids inadvertent subjection to this false government, and avoids being  mistaken for a federal citizen, by signing documents in a certain manner — for example, by identifying  oneself as “John Doe, Executive Trustee for the Private Contract Trust known as JOHN DOE.” Or by  identifying oneself as executor for the strawman, or using a copyright symbol with the name, or saying  “John Doe, Secured Party, Authorized Representative, Attorney-in-Fact in behalf of JOHN DOE ©,” or interspersing colons or hyphens or other odd punctuation in the name, or using the prefix “Noble” or  the suffix “Bey” or “El Bey” with one’s name. And so on.  

To further avoid inadvertent submission to the false government, the sovereign citizen may use  red ink, add thumbprints to documents, put the zip code in brackets or say “near” as part of the address.  There are innumerable varieties of this queer view of the law, but all are intended by the sovereign citizen to make sure you know you are no longer dealing with the enslaved strawman or a federal citizen  with limited rights, you now have the real common law flesh and blood sovereign citizen in front of you. 

Sovereign citizens’ views about the strawman and the treasury account also help explain their  fascination with the Uniform Commercial Code. They tend to believe that by filing a UCC financing  statement they can establish their superior right to that Treasury account. Having established such a  right they then can create bonds which they tender to creditors as payment of their debts. As they read  the UCC, if the creditor wrongly refuses to accept this tender the sovereign debtor is discharged from  any responsibility. There are various other UCC schemes as well that involve security agreements, hold harmless agreements, birth certificate bonds, and various UCC forms. 

Again, the beliefs and practices can vary considerably from group to group and person to  person, but once you are familiar with the ideas above you are more likely to realize you are dealing  with a sovereign citizen. A sovereign citizen named Fred Jones may say “I am agent of Fred Jones” to  inform you that he is not the corporate entity strawman FRED JONES and thus is beyond the court’s  jurisdiction. Sovereign citizens may want to bring their own court reporters to court proceedings. There  will be talk about common law, about Admiralty Law, and about oaths of office. A sovereign citizen may  carry a copy of Black’s Law Dictionary as a reference resource for their common law views. For those  who identify themselves as Moorish Nation or something similar, there also is belief that a 1787 treaty (fictitious) between the United States and Morocco grants them immunity from US law. Some may claim  to occupy United Nations Indigenous People’s Seat 215 — there is no such thing — and create their own  birth certificates and passports in addition to driver’s license and vehicle registrations. 

Sovereign citizens tend to believe in squatters’ rights and have been known to move into houses  that have been foreclosed and abandoned. They will fix up the place and have utilities turned on, then  will file documents they believe confirm their new ownership of the property. 

The point to remember is that, whatever circuitous and illogical route they take to get there — there is no point in trying to find a consistency or a rational pattern in the beliefs — sovereign citizens  reject the current federal, state and local governments and consider themselves outside their authority.  Ironically enough, at the same time they file paper after paper with the very courts whose legitimacy  they deny, seeking to vindicate their common law rights. 


North Carolina appellate cases 

There are few state appellate court decisions debunking sovereign citizens’ arguments because  sovereign citizens almost always represent themselves and either do not appeal the trial court decisions  against them or are unable to perfect an appeal properly. Also, most of the arguments they make are so  obviously frivolous that courts feel free to reject them without much explanation. There are, though, at  least two North Carolina Court of Appeals’ opinions discussing and rejecting a sovereign citizen’s  arguments about the trial court’s lack of jurisdiction over him. The opinions, both involving the same  defendant, are State v. Phillips I, 149 N.C. App. 310 (2002), and State v. Phillips II, 152 N.C. App. 679  (2002). The first opinion includes the more detailed discussion of the defendant’s assertions about  jurisdiction. For the most part the second opinion refers back to the first opinion. Then in Phillips v. 


Wood, 341 F.Supp.2d 576 (MDNC 2004), the federal district court rejected the same defendant’s  attempts to sue the state judges and magistrate for their actions in connection with his state  convictions. 


Names of their organizations 

Two of the most prevalent sovereign citizen groups in North Carolina are the Moorish Nation  and the Washitaw Nation. Moorish Nation adherents may refer also to the Moorish Science Temple,  Moorish Republic, United Nuwaubian Nation of Moors (NUNM), MU’UR Republic or other variations.  Moorish sovereigns tend to be black and younger; many get started on this path in prison. The  Washitaw Nation, a Moorish branch, is tied to a group in Poverty Point, Louisiana. White supremacist  organizations such as the Aryan Nation may embrace sovereign citizen ideology as well. So too may  Freemen and related groups.  

Organizations such as the North-Carolina American Republic (in the Mooresville area), the  Embassy of Heaven, Aware Group and Carolina Liberty also sometimes are listed as sovereign citizens,  but at least some of them say they are different. The North-Carolina American Republic, for example,  distinguishes itself as believing it is the real sovereign state of North Carolina, rejecting the notion of  separate sovereign rights for individuals. Their particular fantasy is that the state government put in  place by the Reconstruction Acts is invalid and that they have re-established the legitimate government  of the state. Accordingly the North-Carolina American Republic has named its own governor, legislature,  etc. It’s a different route than the one followed by sovereign citizens but leads to the same self-serving conclusion that the established state institutions do not have jurisdiction over them. 

Not all sovereign citizens affiliate with any particular organization. Individuals may access  sovereign citizen theory and documents easily through the internet. And not surprisingly there are any  number of vendors of driver’s licenses, license tags, pleadings and other papers who are glad to sell their  wares to anyone who sees in them a means to be free from traffic tickets, debts, taxes and other  government obligations. 



Sovereign citizens may drive vehicles — which they will call “conveyances” — with odd license  tags and registration documents. The license tag might say “Republic of North Carolina” or something  along those lines, or “Kingdom of Heaven” or “Washitaw Nation” or “Washitaw Trustee” or a variation  on those or the other organizational names mentioned above. A common license tag and registration  will say “MU’UR REPUBLIC” and have a United Nations symbol with the words “Indigenous National” or  something similar. Also look for words like “Private Registrant.” Sovereign citizens also tend to put gold  stickers on documents and use multiple notary stamps. 

Sovereign citizens typically carry their own unique drivers’ licenses. Just as with the vehicle tags,  the driver’s license may be issued in the name of the Washitaw Nation, North Carolina American  Republic or whatever particular sect the person has chosen. Some groups issue what appears to be a passport from a foreign government, but on closer examination the issuer is the MU’UR Republic or ISIS Abaannaki Aboriginal Nation or other make-believe government. One common factor in much sovereign  citizen identification, particularly for blacks, is inclusion of “Bey” or “El Bey” in the person’s name, such  as “John-Doe El Bey.”  

In addition to this contrived identification the sovereign citizen may carry a legitimate state  driver’s license. When stopped by an officer or otherwise asked by an official for identification, the  person may produce the fictitious driver’s license first but then when backed into a corner will pull out a  real license. Some sovereign citizens have gotten regular state drivers’ licenses issued to them with their  El Bey name. They also may file a document with the register of deeds purporting to change their name  to El Bey, believing that such a filing is all they need to do. 

Some sovereign citizens will dress in what looks like a law enforcement uniform and will carry a  badge identifying themselves as “county rangers.”  



Below are some unusual words or phrases or manner of punctuation or writing that are commonly used by sovereign citizens, reflecting their beliefs. Some of the words are legitimate legal  terms in the proper context but are meaningless in the way they are used by sovereign citizens. For  example, the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) indeed exists and is an important law for commercial  transactions, but it has none of the purposes ascribed to it by sovereign citizens. It would take a long  time to explain why sovereign citizens speak and write the way they do, or the meanings of these  particular words; just be aware that the recurrence of these ways of communicating is one indicator that  the person is a sovereign citizen. 

Strawman Indigenous 

De facto government Non-resident alien Conveyance (rather than vehicle) Traveling in a private capacity References to UCC Use of red ink 

IRS Form 1099-OID Sui juris 

Travelling in a commercial capacity Redemption 

Aboriginal El Bey 

Who is the victim? Where is your oath of office? © after a person’s name Brackets around a zip code “Employer ID Number” rather than SSN Domicile 

Reference to HJR-192 Charge Back Notice UN Indigenous People’s Seat 215 Debtor is transmitting utility Use of “near” with zip code U.S. Minor, Outlying Islands Special Trust Deposit In Admiralty 

Dishonor in commerce Accepted for value Thumbprints on documents Executor 

Common law Final solution 

Man on the land Free man

Referring to the government as a corporation Requesting an official’s bond Affidavit of truth Fiduciary 

Judicial District of Tens Letters of Marque Title 4 flag Sovereign Living Soul UCC-1 Statement UCC-1-207/1-308

Silence is acquiescence State Citizen 



Ironically, given their views on the illegitimacy of the government, sovereign citizens are prolific  at filing papers with those same government offices. Clerks of courts and registers of deeds are the most  frequent victims. Most of the papers sovereign citizens file seek relief from criminal charges or demand money, and many are designed to harass or intimidate public officials. A sampling of the kinds of  documents clerks of court and registers of deeds might expect from sovereign citizens include: 

∙ A notice of copyright as to the person’s name, often labeled “Common Law Copyright Notice.” ∙ “Registered Warrant Claim for Trust Special Deposit.” 

∙ Filings responding to traffic tickets or other charges labeling those documents as “abandoned  paperwork” and demanding that the court official respond with authentication of authority, a  certified copy of the official’s oath, a certified copy of the officials “Bar Bond”, and so on. 

∙ A response to a traffic ticket or other charge labeled as an “Affidavit of Specific Negative  Averment, Opportunity to Cure, and Counterclaim.” 

∙ “Negative averment” appears on various documents, with the idea that it puts the burden on  the official to respond. 

∙ “Notice of International Commercial Claim Within The Admiralty ab initio Administrative  Remedy.” 

∙ Notices of default and commercial liens and demands for payment. 

∙ “Express Specific Reservations of Rights.” 

∙ “Certification of Non-Response.” 

∙ An invoice for an outrageous sum of money, in the millions or billions of dollars. ∙ “Non-Negotiable Declaration in the Form for Trust Affidavit in Commerce.” 

∙ “Notice of Default for Notice and Demand for Full Disclosure.” 

∙ “Affidavit of Citizenship and Domicile.” 

∙ “Legal Notice: Right to Travel.” 

∙ “Notice of Dishonor.” 

∙ “Notice of Silver Surety Bond.” 

∙ “Asseveration.” 

. “Non-Statutory Abatement: Notice of Default, Default Judgment, and Praecipe.” It is common for sovereign citizens to attempt to file their documents on legal-size paper. 

Sovereign citizens also use a “Charge Back Notice” in response to bills. The message intended by  the notice is that the bill will be paid by the United States Treasury from the sovereign citizen’s strawman account. It is common for documents that sovereign citizens file and send to businesses,  banks, and court officials to say, in effect, that the failure to deny or respond is deemed by the sovereign  to be acceptance of their position. 

Some of the most troublesome activities by sovereigns are their lawsuits and liens against public  officials. Court can deal with frivolous lawsuits through Rule 11 sanctions, contempt and gatekeeper  orders. A false liens can be more difficult to address because the official often does not know until much  later that it has been filed and because filing offices generally are not charged with determining the  legitimacy of a document before accepting it. To help address that problem the legislature in 2012  enacted a new statute, GS 14-118.6, making it a Class I felony to knowingly present for filing a false lien  or encumbrance against the property of a public officer or employee based on that person’s  performance of official duties. The statute subsequently has been amended to include false claim’s  against an officials spouse or child as well. The statute also establishes a procedure for the Register of  Deeds to reject such a filing and allows the public official to sue for treble damages under the unfair and  deceptive trade practices law. 



This paper may be used for educational purposes without permission. 

Use for commercial purposes or without acknowledgement is prohibited. 

© 2012, 2013 School of Government, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.


United in Friendship: The Historic Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States of North America and the Moroccan Empire

 Friends, before we move forward, I felt the need to express my opinion about the last article. I've come to understand that the MATRIX and its gatekeepers do not want to set us free  from mental slavery and tyranny. And because of the very fact that this movement is very much alive and active, other people's opinions are formed and belief systems are shared to try to distract us and try to throw us off course. Meanwhile we all know that JUDGE DALE & THE SUPREME COURTS have made it clear otherwise. I also provided proof of a particular TREATY down below as well as an article. Choosing to become a free individual whether using the title sovereign, national, or state citizen is our given right. However, the decision to be set free is entirely up to us,


In the annals of history, there are moments that transcend borders and time, encapsulating the remarkable power of friendship and diplomacy. Such is the tale of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship signed between the United States of North America and the Moroccan Empire in 1787, with its renewal in 1836. This enduring agreement serves as a testament to the unyielding spirit of cooperation and mutual respect between two nations separated by vast oceans but united by a shared vision for a peaceful world. Let us embark on a journey to explore the inspiring story behind this historic alliance.

The Genesis of Friendship:

In the late 18th century, the world was witness to a monumental event—the birth of a new nation, the United States of America. As the young nation strove to establish itself as a beacon of liberty, it sought to form alliances and cultivate diplomatic relationships across the globe. Morocco, a land of rich culture and history, caught the attention of American diplomats, and it became apparent that forging a bond with this North African kingdom was of great significance.

The Treaty's Provisions:

The Treaty of Peace and Friendship signed in 1787 between the United States and Morocco was a groundbreaking document that laid the foundation for a flourishing friendship. Its significance lies not only in its commitment to mutual assistance and protection but also in the profound respect it embodied for the sovereignty and independence of both nations.

This historic treaty established a lasting framework of trade, diplomacy, and mutual support. It granted American vessels the privilege of free passage through Moroccan waters and provided protection to American citizens and their property residing within the Moroccan Empire. The treaty embodied a vision where the principles of liberty, justice, and equality transcended geographical boundaries and found resonance across cultures and continents.

Renewal in 1836: A Testament to Enduring 


While the passage of time often alters the political landscape, some friendships remain steadfast. In 1836, the Treaty of Peace and Friendship was renewed, reaffirming the commitment of both nations to their shared values and mutual prosperity. The renewal of this historic pact stands as a testament to the unwavering bonds of trust and cooperation between the United States and the Moroccan Empire.

Inspiring a Legacy:

The Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1787/1836 between the United States of North America and the Moroccan Empire serves as a timeless inspiration for future generations. It reminds us that friendship can transcend differences, bridging cultures and continents for the greater good. This alliance fostered an environment where trade flourished, knowledge was exchanged, and the foundation for a brighter future was laid.

Today, the echoes of this historic treaty can still be heard, resonating in the diplomatic ties, economic cooperation, and cultural exchanges between the United States and Morocco. It serves as a reminder that when nations embrace the values of peace, friendship, and understanding, they can build bridges that connect people from diverse backgrounds and promote global harmony.


The Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1787/1836 between the United States of North America and the Moroccan Empire remains an enduring symbol of hope, unity, and cooperation. Through this historic agreement, two nations demonstrated the power of diplomacy, friendship, and the shared pursuit of peace. Let us look back on this remarkable chapter of history with awe and admiration, and may it inspire us to build bridges of friendship that transcend borders and shape a better world for generations to come.

I have attached a link for educational purposes.





Marriage Licenses: The Real Truth

Enlightening Conversation with a Marriage License Bureau ~ by Virgil Cooper  

 About 15 years ago, my former wife of 26½ years, filed for divorce. We had seven (7)  children: five (5) daughters and two (2) sons. Our youngest at the time, our second  son, was five years old. At the time, I prepared a counterclaim to the Petition for  Dissolution her attorney filed in Domestic Relations (DR) court. I met one afternoon  with the head of the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage License Bureau, in  downtown Phoenix. The marriage license bureau was headed by a young woman of  about age 25. I asked her to explain to me the general and statutory implications of  the marriage license. She was very cooperative, and called in an Assistant, a tall Black  man who at the time was working on an Operations Manual for internal  departmental use.  

She deferred most technical explanations to her Assistant. He walked through the  technicalities of the marriage license as it operates in Arizona. He mentioned that  marriage licensing is pretty much the same in the other states -- but there are  differences. One significant difference he mentioned was that Arizona is one of eight  western states that are Community Property states. The other states are Common  Law states, including Utah, with the exception of Louisiana which is a Napoleonic  Code state.  

He then explained some of the technicalities of the marriage license. He  said, first of all, the marriage license is a Secular Contract between the  parties and the State. The State is the principal party in that Secular  Contract. The husband and wife are secondary or inferior parties. The  Secular Contract is a three-way contract between the State, as Principal,  and the husband and wife as the other two legs of the Contract. 

He said, in the traditional sense a marriage is a covenant between the husband and  wife and God. But in the Secular Contract with the state, reference to God is a dotted  line, and NOT officially considered included in the Secular Contract at all. He said, if  the husband and wife wish to include God as a party in their marriage, that is a  "dotted line" they will have to add in their own minds. The state's marriage license is  "strictly secular," he said. He said further, that what he meant by the relationship to  God being a "dotted line" meant that the State regards any mention of God as  irrelevant, even meaningless.  

In his description of the marriage license contract, he related one other "dotted  line." He said in the traditional religious context, marriage was a covenant between  the husband and wife and God with husband and wife joined as one. This is not the  case in the secular realm of the state's marriage license contract. The State is the  Principal or dominant party. The husband and wife are merely contractually "joined"  as business partners, not in any religious union.  

They may even be considered, he said, connected to each other by another "dotted  line." The picture he was trying to "paint" was that of a triangle with the State at the  top and a solid line extending from the apex, the State, down the left side to the 

husband, and a separate solid line extending down the right side to the wife, a  "dotted line" merely showing that they consider themselves to have entered into a  religious union of some sort that is irrelevant to the State.  

Marriage License  

Secular Contract Diagram  


(Primary party)  

HUSBAND                                  WIFE 

      (Secondary party)                (Secondary party)  


(Only recognized in thought by husband and wife state does not acknowledge at all)  


He further mentioned that this "religious overtone" is recognized by the State by  requiring that the marriage must be solemnized either by a state official or by a  minister of religion that has been "deputized" by the State to perform the marriage  ceremony and make a return of the signed and executed marriage license to the  State.  

Again, he emphasized that marriage is a strictly secular relationship so  far as the State is concerned and because it is looked upon as a  "privileged business enterprise" various tax advantages and other  political privileges have become attached to the marriage license  contract that have nothing at all to do with marriage as a religious  covenant or bond between God and a man and a woman.  

By way of reference, if you would like to read a legal treatise on marriage, one of the  best is "Principles of Community Property," by William Defuniak. At the outset, he  explains that Community Property law descends from Roman Civil Law through the  Spanish Codes, 600 A.D., written by the Spanish juris consuls. In the civil law, the  marriage is considered to be a for-profit venture or profit-making venture (even  though it may never actually produce a profit in operation) and as the wife goes out  to the local market to purchase food stuffs and other supplies for the marriage  household, she is replenishing the stocks of the business.  

To restate: In the civil law, the marriage is considered to be a business venture, that  is, a for-profit business venture. Moreover, as children come into the marriage  household, the business venture is considered to have "borne fruit." Now, back to the  explanation by the Maricopa County Superior Court, Marriage Bureau's  administrative Assistant. He went on to explain that every contract must have  consideration. 

The State offers consideration in the form of the actual license itself - the piece of  paper, the Certificate of Marriage.  

The other part of consideration by the State is "the privilege to be regulated by  statute."  

He added that this privilege to be regulated by statute includes all related statutes,  and all court cases as they are ruled on by the courts, and all statutes and regulations  into the future in the years following the commencement of the marriage.  

He said in a way the marriage license contract is a dynamic or flexible, ever-changing  contract as time goes along - even though the husband and wife didn't realize that.  

My thought on this is can it really be considered a true contract as one  becomes aware of the failure by the State to make full disclosure of the  terms and conditions. A contract must be entered into knowingly,  intelligently, intentionally, and with fully informed consent. Otherwise,  technically there is no contract.  

Another way to look at the marriage license contract with the State is as a contract of  adhesion, a contract between two disparate, unequal parties. Again, a flawed  "contract." Such a contract with the State is said to be a "specific performance"  contract as to the privileges, duties and responsibilities that attach. Consideration on  the part of the husband and wife is the actual fee paid and the implied agreement to  be subject to the state's statutes, rules, and regulations and all court cases ruled on  related to marriage law, family law, children, and property.  

 He emphasized that this contractual consideration by the bride and groom places  them in a definite and defined-by-law position inferior and subject to the State. He  commented that very few people realize this. He also said that it is very important to  understand that children born to the marriage are considered by law as "the contract  bearing fruit" - meaning the children primarily belong to the State, even though the  law never comes out and says so in so many words.  

In this regard, children born to the contract are regarded as "the contract  bearing fruit," he said it is vitally important for parents to understand two  doctrines that became established in the United States during the 1930s. The first is  the Doctrine of Parens Patriae. The second is the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis.  Parens Patriae means literally "the parent of the country" or to state it more bluntly -  the State is the undisclosed true parent. Along this line, a 1930s Arizona Supreme  Court case states that parents have no property right in their children, and have  custody of their children during good behavior at the sufferance of the State.  

This means that parents may raise their children and maintain custody of their  children as long as they don't offend the State, but if they in some manner displease  the State, the State can step in at any time and exercise its superior status and take  custody and control of its children - the parents are only conditional caretakers.  [Thus the Doctrine of In Loco Parentis. ] He also added a few more technical details.


The marriage license is an ongoing contractual relationship with the  State.  

Technically, the marriage license is a business license allowing the husband and wife,  in the name of the marriage, to enter into contracts with third parties and contract  mortgages and debts. They can get car loans, home mortgages, and installment debts  in the name of the marriage because it is not only a secular enterprise, but it is looked  upon by the State as a privileged business enterprise as well as a for-profit business  enterprise.  

 The marriage contract acquires property throughout its existence and over time, it is  hoped, increases in value. Also, the marriage contract "bears fruit" by adding  children. If sometime later, the marriage fails, and a "divorce" results the contract  continues in existence.  

The "divorce" is merely a contractual dissolution or amendment of the terms and  conditions of the contract. Jurisdiction of the State over the marriage, over the  husband and wife, now separated, continues and continues over all aspects of the  marriage, over marital property and over children brought into the marriage.  

That is why family law and the Domestic Relations court calls "divorce" a dissolution  of the marriage because the contract continues in operation but in amended or  modified form.  

He also pointed out that the marriage license contract is one of the strongest, most  binding contractual relationships the State has on people.  

At the end of our hour-long meeting, I somewhat humorously asked if other people  had come in and asked the questions I was asking?  

The Assistant replied that in the several years he had worked there, he was not aware  of anyone else asking these questions.  

He added that he was very glad to see someone interested in the legal implications of  the marriage license and the contractual relationship it creates with the State.  

His boss, the young woman Marriage Bureau department head stated,  "You have to understand that people who come in here to get a marriage license are in heat. 

 The last thing they want to know is the technical, legal and statutory implications of the  marriage license."  

I hope this is helpful information to anyone interested in getting more familiar with  the contractual implications of the marriage license.  

 The marriage license as we know it didn't come into existence until after the Civil  War and didn't become standard practice in all the states until after 1900, becoming  firmly established by 1920. 

In effect, the states or governments appropriated or usurped control of marriages in  secular form and in the process declared Common Law applicable to marriages  "abrogated."  


After realizing how I, along with a great number of others all over the world, was tricked into paying for a marriage license, let alone getting married in a church or eloping inside a courtroom. I acted right away. But the point remains the U.S. Government (corporation) historic laws controlling the populace of the country are a kind of oppression and mental slavery.  I'll teach you how to withdraw your signature and exercise another privilege that has been granted to you. Without hesitation, get in touch with me at sushonshebna@thedescendantsofjacobsnation.com


What Is Revocation Of Election (ROE)?





According to the IRS and the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), filing a “Revocation of Electionnotice with the IRS allows about 99% of all state Citizens to become “non-taxable” with no legal obligation to  file a form 1040 Individual Income Tax Return or pay federal income taxes. 

The original Constitution, the Supreme Court, and certain United States Tax Court rulings have proven  that state Citizens of the union are not “subject to” or “liable for” filing a form 1040 “federal”  Individual Income Tax Return and nor are state Citizens liable for paying a “federal” income tax - a  fact the IRS, form 1040 tax return preparers, and foreign banking families receiving income tax dollars  prefer most Citizens in the U.S. never realize. 

Thousands of people have sent the IRS their “Revocation of Election” (ROE) documents and have  never heard from the IRS since doing so. None of the people have received any opposition or challenges from the IRS. Tax laws passed by the U.S. Congress are what's being used. Congress makes and passes tax laws, not the IRS. The IRS has “no dealings” with legal “non-taxpayers.” Filing a 1040 tax return for almost all state Citizens  is only “voluntary” but not legally required or mandatory. 

If a state Citizen / American National does not work in a federal government job or reside in the  District of Columbia (D.C.) or in one of its territories or federal zones and is not involved with an  “excise” taxable “activity,” said state Citizen would not have to file a form 1040 tax return. 

The Supreme Court and many other higher courts have ruled affirmatively on this issue and Congress  has passed legislation confirming this fact. 

American Nationals and state Citizens have the right to send the IRS a “Revocation of Election” (ROE)  document that effectively changes their tax status to that of a “non-taxpayer.”  

When the IRS receives your Revocation of Election (ROE) and your 1040 tax status has been corrected, you are not required to file another form of 1040 tax return in future years. You are effectively  removed from the IRS's taxpayer databases. 

Your ROE document essentially notifies the IRS that you wish to “REVOKE” your previous “ELECTION” to volunteer to be treated like a “taxpayer.” Anyone who has ever filed a form 1040 has inadvertently “elected” to “volunteer” to be treated “as though” they are a “taxpayer” despite all the  laws and court rulings that say state Citizens and American Nationals are not liable for the “federal”  income tax if they are not receiving income sourced from a federal government job in D.C., not  domiciled in D.C., or in one of its territories, and are not involved with an “excise taxable” activity. 

 The IRS will continue to think you are a “taxpayer,” still obligated to “volunteer” (under contract) to  file a tax return, until you give them “notice” of your desire to stop volunteering. The ROE documents serve this purpose. You cannot just stop filing form 1040 without first “revoking” your previous  taxable status “election.”  

There has never been an income tax law that says filing a form 1040 and paying income taxes is “mandatory” for state Citizens or American Nationals (not connected to a federal government job or  office). Income taxes based solely on one's “income” cannot be “mandatory” as this would be in violation of the Constitution and of “their” (D.C.'s) 13th Amendment that outlaws “involuntary” servitude (slavery). Excess taxes is a form of involuntary financial slavery and how do we know the  IRS won't double or triple income tax rates next year?  

Most people think the income tax is based on the amount of money or income they made or received  during the year. This is a false presumption and not the truth as income taxes are actually “excise” taxes  on either an “excise” type of “activity” one is involved in or a “privileged” type of income related to a  job as a public officer or employee of the federal government domiciled in D.C. 

All taxes are either DIRECT or INDIRECT taxes. All taxes related to a form 1040 are definitely INDIRECT taxes based on your involvement in an “excise” or a “privileged” activity form of income.  An income tax solely based on how much you earned in a year would be a DIRECT tax on you.  However, all DIRECT taxes are prohibited by law and by the original Constitution. The IRS knows this, thus, the form 1040 income tax has to be an INDIRECT tax based on an excise taxable “activity”  or a “privileged” source of income received from the federal government in D.C.  

The IRS tax codes however, fail to clearly mention which specific “activities” are considered to be  “excise” (taxable) type activities for “individuals” and if you don't work for the federal government in  D.C. basically, then concluding that you have no “privileged” type of income is not difficult to prove. 

31 U.S.C. says income taxes paid to the U.S. Treasury are considered to be nothing more than  voluntary “donations” to the Treasury. Have you ever heard of “donations” being “mandatory”? 

The original Constitution (1787) also outlawed income taxes not apportioned on state Citizens  (American Nationals) and the Supreme Court has confirmed the original Constitution's intent on this  most important fact. In other words, no DIRECT income taxes are legally allowed. 

The original Constitution says in Article 1, section 9 clause 4, to wit: “No Capitation, or other direct tax  shall be laid, [on state Citizens] unless in proportion [apportioned] to the Census....” The IRS does not  apportion their income taxes on state Citizens so they incorrectly claim to call their tax an “excise” tax, and use the amount of your annual earnings to determine the amount of “excise” tax you allegedly owe.  

When the IRS seemingly demands that you file a form 1040 tax return, is this a violation of the original  Constitution? Yes, but not if state Citizens don't know their rights and they “volunteer” or “elect” to be  taxed “as though” they were a “federal” citizen domiciled in D.C. “Federal” (D.C.) citizens may owe  an income tax but state Citizens do not, unless they are involved in an “excise” taxable activity which  generally applies only to corporations and almost never to living men and women living in the states. 

In the famous Supreme Court case ruling in Pollock v. Farmers's Loan and Trust Co. (1895), the  federal government and the IRS learned that they could not impose an income tax on state Citizens and  no other court ruling has ever overturned the Pollock v. Farmers's Loan and Trust Co. ruling to date.

 The IRS, at their highest levels, is well aware that most state Citizens and American Nationals, not  connected to a federal government office or who do not live in D.C., have no legal obligation to file a  form 1040 tax return, but you have to let the IRS know you want to “revoke” your previous “elected”  taxable status as a “taxpayer” so the IRS can change your IRS records to a “non-taxable” status. 

Many people over the last seven years have sent the IRS their ROE and they have not heard from the  IRS since. A ROE legally terminates your previous voluntary taxable “election” to file a form 1040 in future years, an election you unknowingly made when you filed your first form of 1040 tax return. 

The District of Columbia (D.C.), where the IRS is headquartered, is defined in tax law to be a “foreign” jurisdiction in relation to the 50 states of the union. Are you liable for or “subject to” income tax laws  “only applicable” to a foreign (D.C.) ten mile square land area and the people who “reside” there? Do you reside in the District of Columbia? If not, you most likely are a legal non-taxpayer. 

The word “Internal” as in 'Internal' Revenue Service, means “municipal,” limited to the ten-mile square  land area known as Washington, District of Columbia (D.C.). 

When the IRS learned it could not impose an income tax on state Citizens as a result of the Pollock v.  Farmer's Loan and Trust Co., Supreme Court ruling, the 16th Amendment was allegedly ratified that  allowed the IRS to impose an income tax “only” on National government employees and government  officers and certain people connected to the government and or domiciled in D.C., “subject to” that  specific ten mile square D.C. area jurisdiction. 

Because the District of Columbia is a “foreign” enclave related to the 50 states and it is not one of the  50 states of the union under the original Constitution (1787), the IRS in D.C. does not have to abide by  the original Constitution that forbids DIRECT income taxing state Citizens, when it taxes the National  Government - government officers - “fiduciaries” domiciled in the non-union state known as D.C.  

Imposing a local “municipal” law - 16th Amendment income tax on government officers or “U.S.  citizens” (means “statutory” citizens) domiciled in D.C., is perfectly legal, but it is not legal to impose  an income tax on state Citizens / American Nationals of the 50 Republic states of the union, after the  IRS receives your Revocation of Election that says you wish to stop “volunteering” to file a form 1040. 

Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., clearly defines “foreign state” as: “The several United States are  considered “foreign” to each other except as regards to their relations as common members of the  Union … one state of the Union is foreign to another ….”  

The United States government is operating as a foreign corporation with respect to a state. In re:  Merriam's Estate, 36 N.E. 505 and affirmed in U.S. v. Perkins 16 S. ct. 1073, 163 U.S. 

The U.S. The federal government, seated in D.C., is a “foreign” corporation with respect to a state of the union [under the original Constitution], 19 Corpus Juris Secundum sec. 883 (2003). [emphasis added]. 

The State of Maine's Supreme Court stated: “Our Right of Election” or “freedom of choice” between two different forms of government, state Citizens are under no legal or lawful obligation to join or  pledge any allegiance to the foreign legislative democracy [in D.C.], 44 Maine 518.

We use the term “American National” to describe a person sending a Revocation of Election (ROE) to the IRS as it's quite clear that the IRS has no jurisdiction over American Nationals and the IRS understands, recognizes, and has been accepting this term. When you learn who you really are you will understand why you are not a taxpayer.  

An American National (similar to a state Citizen) is or can be a sovereign who was born in one of the  50 states of the union or who has been naturalized into the Constitutional Republic. 

American Nationals have always been defined as “non-taxpayers” by Congress as they were explicitly excluded from D.C.'s “exclusive” 16th Amendment legislation only related to IRS taxing authority for D.C. residents, government “public officers,” and others directly connected to the government in D.C. 

The term “United States” is defined in 31 USC 321(d)(2) and in 26 U.S.C. sec 7001 as meaning the federal government in the District of Columbia and it is not defined as the 50 states of the union per 26  U.S.C. 7408 (d). Do you really want to be a “citizen” of the “United States” [read D.C.] under the  “foreign” jurisdiction of the IRS in D.C. when you have the freedom of choice not to be? 

There are no “implementing” regulations recorded in the Federal Register imposing any “income tax”  liability upon American Nationals or state Citizens, because there is no such thing as an “Income  Tax.” A tax on “your income only” is prohibited by the original Constitution and various high court tax case rulings. The income tax is really an “excise” tax measured by the income you earned. 

There is a form 1040 “excise” tax based on “excise” taxable “ACTIVITIES” one might be involved in, but the tax codes do not expressly mention what “activities” are excise taxable for individuals. If income tax regulations are not recorded in the Federal Register, that means they are not “positive” enacted laws and therefore, said non-registered tax regulations (not laws) do not apply to state Citizens and American Nationals, unless (non-taxable) state Citizens / American Nationals “volunteer” and  “elect” to be treated “as though” they were a taxpayer, by voluntarily filing a form 1040.  

In the decision in U.S. v. Mersky, 361 US 431, a similar ruling as in California Bankers v. Shultz, the court ruled that IRC section 6001 (regarding 1040 filing) cannot be enforced without there first being  an “implementing” regulation promulgated (recorded) in the Federal Register. To date, there are no  implementing regulations applicable to filing a form 1040 recorded in the Federal Register and there  haven't been any for over the last sixty years or so. 

 Title 28 USC 7851 (a)(6)(A) states; there is no authority for the IRS to use any enforcement action  against American Nationals until Title 26 U.S.C. has been enacted into “positive” law (making  Title 26 applicable to state Citizens / American Nationals) by being published (promulgated) in the  Federal Register. After another sixty years, direct income taxes will still not be applicable to American  Nationals / state Citizens as they are prohibited by the Constitution (1789). 

Michael L. White, Federal Attorney, Office of the Federal Register, openly stated in his legal opinion  letter in 1994, that there are no enforcement regulations published in the Federal Register nor is there  any published requirement there requiring American Nationals to file or pay an income tax.

 A Statute [related to Title 26 that deals with form 1040 ] is void according to the Supreme Court when it lacks an “implementing” regulation promulgated (recorded) in the Federal Register and, thus, cannot  be enforced. California Bankers v. Schultz, 416 US 25, 44 39 L. Ed 2nd 912,94 S. Court. There is no “implementing” regulation applicable to a form 1040, thus, there is no law to enforce income taxes. 

The Internal Revenue Code is only “prima facie” and “color of law” as per 1 USCA 204(a), meaning  that it is only a “presumption” or “suggestion” (by the IRS) of tax law and it stands as tax law unless  rebutted. The ROE effectively rebuts the IRS's “presumption” that you are a “taxpayer” and ends  the IRS's presumption. The IRS has to dispute your ROE notice within sixty days – they never do. 

The term “American National” is never used in the Internal Revenue Code because sentient natural born men and women are not “juristic,” “federal,” “U.S. persons” or “U.S. Citizens” or “fictions” or  any other “term” the IRS uses to define someone as a “taxpayer.” You must understand who you really are and who you are not. John Michael Doe, the living man with unalienable rights, is not the same  person as JOHN MICHAEL DOE, the government created a fictional character with limited or no  inalienable rights. The IRS is taxing JOHN MICHAEL DOE, they are not income taxing John Michael  Doe. How was your name spelled at your birth and how does the IRS spell your name? Hmmm. 

American Nationals are not mentioned in the tax codes because the IRS only deals with “taxpayers” and it has no jurisdiction or authority over legal non-taxpayers and tax court rulings have proven this. 

In IRS publication 519, “A nonresident alien” [American National] who never worked in the U.S.  Government in the United States [meaning D.C.] will not be liable for the U.S. [D.C.] income tax. 

Former IRS Commissioner Charles O. Rossotti stated in a delegated response letter that: “The law itself  does not require individuals to file a form 1040.” 

Under oath before Congress, Dwight E. Avis, Bureau of Internal Revenue, stated in part, “Your income tax is a 100% voluntary tax.” 

Mark L. Forman, a Legislative Correspondent, U.S. Senate, on 6/26/89 wrote, “Based on the research  performed by the Congressional Research Service, there is no provision which specifically and  unequivocally requires an individual to pay income taxes.” 

The Tennessee Supreme Court was clear when it said that the right to receive income or earnings is a  right belonging to every person, this right cannot be taxed as a privilege. Jack Cole v. MacFarland, 337 S.W. 2D 453, 456 (Tenn. 1960). 

There are no “regulations” extending to the Commissioner of the IRS or the Department of the  Treasury their authority to the 50 Union States – 26 CFR 7802(a). 

The IRS appears to be a “foreign” Trust domiciled in Puerto Rico as per 31 USC 1321 (a)(62) and is not an original Constitution-authorized agency of the federal government as defined in the Freedom of  Information Act (FOIA) and the Administrative Procedures Act in 5 USC 5551 (1)(C). 

The IRS is a private corporation domiciled in a “foreign” enclave or nation state called the District of Columbia whose jurisdiction doesn't apply to American Nationals. Therefore, it matters not to American Nationals what the IRS's income tax regulations say as they only apply to government  employees or those connected to D.C.'s municipal government laws or to those who have received  income from a government source or who are involved in an “excise” or “privilege” type of activity.  

26 USC 7701(a)(31) basically says that an American National Estate is a “tax-exempt” foreign estate or trust. It's a “foreign” estate because American Nationals, living in one of the 50 states of the  Republic, are by law living in a “foreign” state related to that other “foreign” state named the District  of Columbia that is not under the original Constitution (1789). 

The IRS regularly claims that the income tax is voluntary. When you send the IRS your ROE, you are notifying them that you don't wish to volunteer to “donate” your personal “private property” (federal  reserve notes) in the future and the IRS cannot legally deny your instructions provided in your ROE. 

In Long v. Rasmussen, revenue laws relate to “taxpayers” not to “non-taxpayers.” The ROE you send to  the IRS requires them to change your tax status to that of a “non-taxpayer.” 

“In the United States of America, there are two (2) separate and distinct jurisdictions, one such being the jurisdiction of the states within their own state boundaries, and the other being federal jurisdiction (United States), which is limited to the District of Columbia, U.S. Territories, and federal enclaves  within the states, under Article 1, section 8, Clause 17,” Bevans v. United States, 16 U.S. 336. 

United States: The term “United States” (used by the IRS) when used in a geographical sense includes  [meaning is limited to] only the [federal zone] States [the District of Columbia and other federal  territories within the borders of the states] and the District of Columbia, [but the word “States” in this definition does not include the 50 states of the union], 26 USC sec. 7701. [emphasis added]. 

It actually matters not how IRS words and terms are defined because if you are not earning “privileged” income from the government and are not involved in an “excise” taxable activity, you are not defined in law as a “taxpayer,” thus, you are not liable for filing a 1040 (excise / income) tax return. 

 Do you really want to be a citizen of the “United States” (read D.C.) under D.C.'s federal IRS taxing  powers - limited to D.C. domiciled citizens when you could be (and are) a “non-taxable” American  National? One of the three definitions of “United States” does include the 50 states of the union, but  when used in the tax codes, “United States” is always referring to and means the District of Columbia. 

Your Creator grants you agency, dominion, and a free will choice (sovereignty) to determine who you are. Your Creator granted you “inalienable and un-a-lien-able rights” to Life, Liberty, and the  pursuit of Happiness and the right to own and keep your “earnings” (private property) earned from the “private sector” without accepting “privileges” from a private corporation government in D.C. or being  unlawfully taxed when the original Constitution (1787) protects you against the “federal” income tax. 

Government “privileges'' can be taken away at the government's whim. Unalienable "rights" and your rights of agency, dominion, and a free will to choose your political and taxing jurisdiction can never be  mandatory taken away from you, unless you allow them to be (by filing a form 1040 tax return). 

Being an American National and sending the IRS your ROE to change your tax status does not affect your Social Security standing or your Social Security payments you may be receiving now or will be  receiving in the future. A ROE sent to the IRS “ONLY” affects your tax status with the IRS and is not related or connected to any other government “benefit” (i.e. Medicare) program you receive now or  might be receiving in the future. 

If your employer is deducting W-4 withholding amounts from your paychecks, this will have to be stopped and corrected asap. I can help you get this accomplished. 

This W-4 withholding matter is a separate (from the ROE) process, but directly related to having  you not pay income taxes which you do not owe. Regarding the cost and time frame to get your W-4  and state type withholding deductions from your paychecks stopped, please contact me.  

A one time ROE submission to the IRS covers all future years. No more 1040 forms need to be filed in the future and no more income taxes will be due from you in future years. You will learn that there  really is no such thing as an “income tax” - a tax on your income, according to the Constitution (1787),  various high court tax case rulings, and tax laws passed by Congress. 

The Revocation of Election addresses Congress' legal process to exit the U.S. income (excise) tax system. Filing a ROE has no bearing on anything else (like medicare or Social Security). Prior year IRS pending disputes or unpaid back tax year problems - amounts allegedly due - are not retroactively affected or resolved by filing a ROE, just the 2023 tax year and beyond.

I've already completed the necessary measures to revoke my election, and I'd be more than happy to assist you in doing the same. You may contact me by email at sushonshebna@thedescendantsofjacobsnation.com and through my paypal account, shebna101, is where I accept donations.



What Is A Trust And What Does It Do?

A trust, a powerful legal instrument, serves as a versatile and effective tool for individuals and families to manage and protect their assets while accomplishing various financial and personal goals. It embodies a carefully crafted arrangement wherein a person or entity (the trustee) holds and administers assets on behalf of another person or group (the beneficiaries), guided by specific terms and conditions outlined in a trust document.

Trusts have gained widespread popularity due to their flexibility and the myriad of benefits they offer. Let us delve into their purpose, usage, and the advantages of establishing a trust with a creative and professional perspective.

The primary purpose of a trust is twofold: to safeguard assets and to facilitate their efficient distribution. By transferring assets to a trust, individuals can shield them from unforeseen risks, such as lawsuits, creditors, or excessive taxation. This protective shield can prove invaluable in preserving wealth for future generations or ensuring the well-being of loved ones.

Trusts are remarkably versatile and can be tailored to suit specific needs and objectives. They find application in various scenarios, including estate planning, wealth preservation, charitable endeavors, and incapacity planning. For instance, a revocable living trust enables individuals to maintain control over their assets during their lifetime while streamlining the distribution process after their demise. In contrast, an irrevocable trust may serve as an effective means to minimize estate taxes and protect assets from potential claims.

One of the prominent benefits of establishing a trust is the ability to exercise precise control over the administration and distribution of assets. Through a trust, individuals can outline specific instructions on how their assets should be managed and disbursed. This level of control empowers the grantor (the person creating the trust) to govern the timing, conditions, and purpose of asset transfers, even beyond their lifetime. It ensures that their wealth is utilized in accordance with their wishes, whether it involves providing for family members, supporting charitable causes, or financing educational pursuits.

Furthermore, trusts offer considerable privacy advantages. Unlike wills, which undergo probate, a potentially public process, trusts allow for confidential asset transfer and administration. Privacy not only shields sensitive financial information from prying eyes but also prevents potential disputes or challenges that may arise from public scrutiny. The discreet nature of trusts ensures that beneficiaries can receive their entitlements without unnecessary attention or interference.

In addition to their protective and controlling aspects, trusts can facilitate the efficient management of assets. By placing assets under the stewardship of a trustee, individuals can leverage the expertise and professional acumen of financial advisors or institutions. Trusts enable the seamless transition of asset management responsibilities, ensuring continuity even in the face of changing circumstances or the grantor's incapacitation.

Finally, trusts can yield significant tax advantages. Depending on the jurisdiction and the type of trust established, it may be possible to reduce estate taxes, gift taxes, or even income taxes. Properly structured trusts can optimize tax planning strategies, allowing individuals to maximize the value of their assets and minimize their tax liabilities. This aspect of trusts underscores their role as invaluable tools in preserving and enhancing wealth.

In conclusion, a trust represents a sophisticated and versatile legal instrument that serves multiple purposes. From protecting assets and ensuring their efficient distribution to enabling precise control, preserving privacy, facilitating professional management, and optimizing tax planning, trusts offer a plethora of benefits. By engaging in careful and thoughtful trust planning, individuals and families can safeguard their wealth, shape their legacies, and provide for their loved ones in a manner that aligns with their unique aspirations and goals.

The Almighty, The Bible, The U.S. Constitution, & The Declaration of Independence

The United States Constitution and the Declaration of Independence contain references to God and the Bible due to a combination of historical, cultural, and philosophical factors that influenced the founding of the United States. It's important to note that while these documents do mention God and biblical principles, they also establish a secular government that respects the religious freedom of its citizens. 

Historical context: The founders of the United States were influenced by the prevailing religious beliefs and values of their time. During the late 18th century, the majority of Americans identified as Christians, and religion played a significant role in their lives. References to God and biblical ideas were a common way to express moral principles and invoke a sense of divine authority. 

Natural law and natural rights: 
The concept of natural law, which influenced the thinking of the framers of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, suggests that there are fundamental moral principles that are inherent in the natural order of the world. These principles are believed to come from a higher power or a divine source. 
By acknowledging God in these documents, the framers were affirming their belief that certain rights and freedoms are derived from a higher authority, not just from human-made laws. 

Moral foundations: The founders recognized the importance of moral and ethical values in maintaining a just and orderly society. They believed that religious principles, including those found in the Bible, provided a solid moral foundation for the new nation. By referencing God and biblical ideas, they sought to establish a moral framework that would guide the actions of the government and its citizens. 

Inspiring the people: The inclusion of religious language in the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence was also a way to connect with and inspire the predominantly religious population. By appealing to shared religious beliefs and values, the founders aimed to foster a sense of unity and support for the new nation. However, it's worth noting that the Constitution itself is a secular document that establishes a system of government separate from any particular religious institution. 

The First Amendment of the Constitution ensures the freedom of religion and prohibits the establishment of an official state religion. This demonstrates the founders' intent to create a government that respects the diversity of religious beliefs and allows individuals to practice their faith freely or choose not to practice any religion at all. 

In summary, the references to God and the Bible in the United States Constitution and the Declaration of Independence reflect the historical context, moral foundations, and philosophical beliefs of the time. While acknowledging religious principles, the founders also established a secular government that protects religious freedom and separates church and state.

Email me at sushonshebna@thedescendantsofjacobsnation.com and let's get it in!!!

Queen Shebna

The Descendants of Jacob's Nation

© 2024 thedescendantsofjacobsnation. All rights reserved.

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details and accept the service to view the translations.